<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tesla Hires Gun, Will Shoot Its Way Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenlight.greentechmedia.com/2008/05/16/tesla-hires-gun-will-shoot-its-way-out-250/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenlight.greentechmedia.com/2008/05/16/tesla-hires-gun-will-shoot-its-way-out-250/</link>
	<description>Green Light is the traffic cop at the intersection of green technology, business and policy. We cover the highs and lows of the greentech market, providing news, commentary and analysis on the companies and personalities–-winners and losers alike-–driving its growth and evolution.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darryl SIry</title>
		<link>http://greenlight.greentechmedia.com/2008/05/16/tesla-hires-gun-will-shoot-its-way-out-250/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl SIry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlight.greentechmedia.com/?p=250#comment-178</guid>
		<description>WS and/or Larry Sonsini did not take a stake in Tesla</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WS and/or Larry Sonsini did not take a stake in Tesla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel englander</title>
		<link>http://greenlight.greentechmedia.com/2008/05/16/tesla-hires-gun-will-shoot-its-way-out-250/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel englander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlight.greentechmedia.com/?p=250#comment-176</guid>
		<description>hey darryl - always good to hear from you. so, when's your IPO date? 

also, sonsini's an interesting choice. i believe the man was once described as the "Larry Bird of Silicon Valley. The go-to guy when you need the thing to work." (http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/11/27/8394382/index.htm)

So, what's not working? If your primary goal here is ramping up production to meet targets, get cars into customer hands, and actually fill that Apple Store lookalike you've built in Los Angeles with a saleable product, why didn't you get a board member with a background in, I don't know, cars? I hear Lee Iaccoca isn't too busy these days. 

It's interesting that you've chosen to focus here on "corporate governance and corporate finance." Did WS Investments take a stake in Tesla?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey darryl - always good to hear from you. so, when&#8217;s your IPO date? </p>
<p>also, sonsini&#8217;s an interesting choice. i believe the man was once described as the &#8220;Larry Bird of Silicon Valley. The go-to guy when you need the thing to work.&#8221; (http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/11/27/8394382/index.htm)</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s not working? If your primary goal here is ramping up production to meet targets, get cars into customer hands, and actually fill that Apple Store lookalike you&#8217;ve built in Los Angeles with a saleable product, why didn&#8217;t you get a board member with a background in, I don&#8217;t know, cars? I hear Lee Iaccoca isn&#8217;t too busy these days. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that you&#8217;ve chosen to focus here on &#8220;corporate governance and corporate finance.&#8221; Did WS Investments take a stake in Tesla?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl SIry</title>
		<link>http://greenlight.greentechmedia.com/2008/05/16/tesla-hires-gun-will-shoot-its-way-out-250/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl SIry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenlight.greentechmedia.com/?p=250#comment-172</guid>
		<description>This article is so flawed I don't know where to begin! 

Lets start with the fact that Larry Sonsini does not just join boards of people who want his legal assistance. If that were the case he would be on many hundreds of boards. His joining our board has nothing to do with the lawsuits you mention, although his experience in such matters is obviously valuable, as is his experience in other areas of corporate governance and corporate finance.

Regarding production of the Roadster: we anticipated a slow ramp and are a bit behind the schedule in the early going (as we reported to our customers and on our blog), but that has nothing to do with the fact that we "are relying on third party components." What does that even mean? All car manufacturers rely on third party components for all their cars. 

Our planned acceleration of production when the final transmission is completed has nothing to do with the Magna lawsuit. The transmission that Magna designed, which proved not to be durable, is history. The lawsuit is over a disagreement as to what is owed at the conclusion of that relationship. Our plans for the permanent transmission are unrelated to the lawsuit and have no connection to it. On what basis are you conditioning our completion of the final transmission to the conclusion of that legal matter?

This article is a poor mashup of other people's reporting with some lazy speculation thrown in. I'm all for open discussion and healthy criticism but this is just bad reporting.

Darryl from Tesla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is so flawed I don&#8217;t know where to begin! </p>
<p>Lets start with the fact that Larry Sonsini does not just join boards of people who want his legal assistance. If that were the case he would be on many hundreds of boards. His joining our board has nothing to do with the lawsuits you mention, although his experience in such matters is obviously valuable, as is his experience in other areas of corporate governance and corporate finance.</p>
<p>Regarding production of the Roadster: we anticipated a slow ramp and are a bit behind the schedule in the early going (as we reported to our customers and on our blog), but that has nothing to do with the fact that we &#8220;are relying on third party components.&#8221; What does that even mean? All car manufacturers rely on third party components for all their cars. </p>
<p>Our planned acceleration of production when the final transmission is completed has nothing to do with the Magna lawsuit. The transmission that Magna designed, which proved not to be durable, is history. The lawsuit is over a disagreement as to what is owed at the conclusion of that relationship. Our plans for the permanent transmission are unrelated to the lawsuit and have no connection to it. On what basis are you conditioning our completion of the final transmission to the conclusion of that legal matter?</p>
<p>This article is a poor mashup of other people&#8217;s reporting with some lazy speculation thrown in. I&#8217;m all for open discussion and healthy criticism but this is just bad reporting.</p>
<p>Darryl from Tesla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
